Laraib Khursheed1, Dr. Sadaf Hafeez Chohan2*, Amna Alvi3

1M. Phil Scholar, Ripah International University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

2*Assistant Professor, College of Clinical Psychology, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan

3Lecturer, Ripah International University, Faisalabad, Pakistan


Aims Of Study: Coronavirus is a potentially deadly disease that mostly affects human lung tissue. Multiple cases of unexplained respiratory tract infections were reported to the World Health Organization China in December 2019. The focus of this research was to assess association between depression and PWB in patients who had been isolated due to covid-19.

Methodology: A sample of 250 people with covid-19 post quarantine, with age ranges from 25 to 45 were selected by using purposive sampling methods. Depression, anxiety, stress scale and psychological well-being scales were administered. Regression analysis and t-test were employed for statistical analysis.

Results: Obtained results evidenced that depression is significantly predict psychological health in the covid-19 population [B= -.015, -.019, F (7.915) sig= .000]. Gender difference is also observed in variable of depression also [(4.78) =.030, p.000].

Limitations and future implications: Future research may base on longitudinal analyses focusing on familial and social factors that may influence the psychological well-being of people living in quarantine.

Originality: I certify that the intellectual substance of this article is the result of my own effort and that all assistance and sources used in the preparation of this article have been acknowledged.

Conclusion: It was concluded that Depression affects people with COVID-19 and PWB after quarantine. future research may focus more on the influence of the interaction between quarantine and adults’ mental health to fully comprehend the link.

Keywords: Depression, adults, psychological wellbeing, under-gone, quarantine, covid-19.


Infections that affect millions of people across several nations and have the potential to spread throughout the globe are known as pandemics1.In recent ages, there have been a lot of pandemics, posing a threat to humanity Taylor (2019). The World Health Organization (WHO) officially labeled COVID-19 a global pandemic on March 11, 20201.   Pre-proclamation, China has already formally reported it. This new coronavirus has been designated according to the WHO, the world’s sixth-most urgent public health issue2.

With a total of 5,593,631 confirmed and death cases, respectively, and 216 nations, areas, or territories reporting confirmed cases as of May 28, 2020, the global mortality rate was 6.32 percent. 1 According to clinical research, typical symptoms include fever, dry cough, and exhaustion of a novel coronavirus, unlike the more common complaints of aches and pains and sinus congestion, diarrhea, smell and taste changes, respiratory difficulties, and various other strange symptoms1,3,4. In addition to an epidemiological crisis, pandemics like the coronavirus induce a mental breakdown (i.e., anxiety, depression, insomnia, trauma, anger, psychosis, panic, and boredom)5,6  . According to new research, nearly half of those polled are dealing with effects on emotional stability of the current epidemic7,8.

Governments are taking drastic measures to stop COVID-19 from spreading. This new global pandemic has brought society to a halt and is wreaking havoc on the worldwide budget.9 The survival of trades and economies throughout the universe is a monumental task. Several industries have already begun to lay off workers, while others are thriving. 10 More than a million individuals have previously been laid off, many others are suffering as a result of COVID-19’s impacts. 11 People’s fears of economic and social anxiety arose as a result of this uncertain situation, resulting in a slew of psychological and physiological diseases12.

In some respects, social networks and other new kinds of nontraditional mass media aggravate the situation. The lack of control over rumors, as well as inaccurate and untrustworthy information, has pushed COVID-19 dread to unprecedented levels13.   As a result, people become frightened, unhappy, disappointed, and stigmatized, and many of them attempt suicide due to their uncertain condition14,15, argued that clinical signs of distress and nervousness were found during infectious disease outbreaks. Once again, there is a strong link between distress, apprehension, and unhappiness16.      

More exposure to misinformation via social media, Chinese researchers say is more likely to exacerbate symptoms of mental illness like depression and other depressive symptoms. It is possible to isolate in quarantined areas and quarantine in unaffected areas. Individuals who have been isolated in the past are at risk of illness and isolation, both of which can be exceedingly upsetting to their mental health17.

Depression is a term that refers to a variety of undesirable effects on one’s mental health. Loneliness has been linked to less time in bed while sleeping (7 percent less regrettable sleep productivity) and more waking time after sleep begins18 Loneliness, when combined with a low self-rated feeling of well-being, a low utilitarian position, visual impairments, and a perceived worrisome change in one’s life quality, can lead to heightened misery symptomatology. Depression has been linked to a gradual deterioration in cognition, just like depressive side effects18.

Psychological well-being is a subjective and global assessment of one’s ability to cope with a wide range of emotions. Psychological well-being has two important components. The main concern is the amount of pleasant sensations and blissful sentiments that humans experience. Emotional prosperity is another term for this aspect of mental wealth. Mental well-being is linked to a person’s ability to persuade others in the face of common issues to collaborate with them. Low levels of PWB, despite this, are linked to the requirements of the individual. The quality of one’s mental health is closely tied to the quality of one’s outlook and inner resources. Mental well-being has many other important aspects, such as how happy and enchanting people feel when they are experiencing high levels of mental happiness and well-being19.

Mental health research involves subjective situations and good tonic results. A sense of contentment with one’s life, joy, and confidence in one’s own skills are all examples of psychological well-being. These well-being markers require good emotions. Existential happiness indices, like the meaning of life, may be linked to neutral or negative emotions, but they promote positive ones20.

Previous research has shown that in a COVID-19-affected society, sadness levels and related variables are elevated. Solemnity, fear of death, sleep problems, feelings of worthlessness and alcoholism were among the symptoms encountered by members who had to relocate during the seclusion. Those who spent time with their family took time for themselves, or were otherwise engaged in residential training or jobs were less likely to receive demoralizing scores21.

The primary objectives of the study was to assess the degree of depression and overall psychological health among people who have been institutionalized with Covid-19. Anxiety, depression, stress, sleep difficulties, and panic attacks are on the rise as a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, according to reports from a number of nations. These issues are increasing drug use and, in some cases, suicidal ideation. In the first scenario, those who are imprisoned incur the chance of being ill as well as being alone themselves, which could be highly hard on their mental health. Anxiety, despair, stress, sleep difficulties, and terror were all factors that this study sought to better understand in relation to the residents’ COVID-19 preventive behaviors.


Gender, marital status, education, and time spent in quarantine were all taken into account in this study. The (DASS-21 scale was used. There would be three self-report evaluations compiled into the English version of the DASS–Short Form Scale-21 (DASS-21): grief, discomfort, and stretching. Subscales with differing degrees of content are created from each of the seven items on the DASS-21 scales. Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.81, 0.89, and 0.78 for the depression, discomfort and use of subscales confirmed the DASS-21’s unwavering quality. racial oppression validity, and the composite unwavering quality all garnered excellent reviews from the community members22.

Another scale was used which was the Psychological Well-being Scale (Ryff) Measures of psychological well-being are employed in the English translation through the usage of the mental well-being scale. 23 For the consider (I disagree), a 42-point scale, for instance, the Likert scale response, varying between 6 and 1. (I disagree with this idea) to (I agree with this idea), was employed. As you move up the scale, your mental health improves. Freedom, natural exchange, individual evolution, strong interpersonal links, and the rationale for one’s life and activities are all included in this explanation list of six characteristics of mental health. The PEB Scale’s constant quality coefficients range varing 0.78 to 0.9723.   For statistical analysis IBM SPSS 25.0 was used to conduct the statistical analysis of the dataset. Analyzing the data necessitated both descriptive and inferential statistics. The descriptive analysis relied on basic metrics like counts and percentages, as well as the mean and standard deviation. The researchers used correlation, regression, and a t-test on independent samples to examine the study’s hypothesis.

Research Design

A correlational study approach was applied in this study. In a correlational design, this strategy aids in the exploration of connections between traits without controlling or altering each of them. Correlational research is an excellent approach to quickly getting data from natural settings. So that their conclusions can be applied to real-world situations in an objectively acceptable manner.

Population of the study

Only the covid-19 survivors who made it through quarantine are included in this inquiry. In terms of their educational, financial, and familial statuses, the participants had a wide range. After obtaining informed consent, the study’s participants, both men, and women were drawn from the Covid-19 population.


After quarantine, for this study, N=250 patients in Faisalabad, Pakistan with Covid-19 were selected. Between the ages of 25 and 45, the population age groups were chosen. The sample included 125 men and 125 women. People from Covid-19 were included in the sample after quarantine. A-priori sample size student t-test online calculator was used to support the study’s sample.

Sampling Technique and Procedure

Data was gathered through random selection from various parts of the city. Written consent and questionnaires were provided to participants during the research, along with a short summary of the study’s purpose.


H1. Those who had Covid-19 after quarantine would have a substantial association between depression and PWB.

H2.  Depression predicts negative psychological wellbeing   in Covid-19 following quarantine.

H3. Patients with Covid-19 would experience substantial gender differences in depression and psychological well-being following quarantine.


Covid-19 patients who had been isolated owing to depression and psychological well-being were the primary focus of the study. To calculate the results SPSS (SPSS) were used. A bivariate correlation analysis was used to show the correlations between success measures. The frequencies and percentages of each demographic group examined in this study are displayed in Table 1.

The percentages and frequencies of various demographics are shown in the table above. It was noted that 54% people are married and 46%people are unmarried in total sample size. Moreover most of the people 34% (were quarantine to 30 to 45 days), 27.6%, (were quarantine to 15 to 30 days), 21.6%, (were quarantine to 45 to 60 days), 10.8 %, were quarantine to 0 to 15 days), and 6% were (quarantine to more than 60 days) overall the sample.

According to Table 2, the age descriptive statistics have a mean of 33.88 and a standard deviation of 5.66.

Table 3 demonstrates that the PWB Scales.87 and the DASS.94 have alpha reliability coefficients that are significantly acceptable. These data also suggested that these measures might occur prior to the sample’s total analysis.

Level (1-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

According to the results of this study’s findings, self-esteem is negatively associated with both the DASS’s and depression subscale. At p,000, similarly psychological well-being correlates negatively with DASS and its depression subscale.

  1. Dependent Variable: Depression
  2. Predictors: (Constant Psychological Well-being scale (Ryff)

Depression was found to be a significant negative predictor of psychological health in covid-19 persons after quarantine [B= -.015, -.019, F (7.915) = p>.000].

Findings (Table 6) show that people with covid-19 following quarantine show a substantial gender difference in the factors of depression. Females were experiencing more depression (t 50.359 p value.000) as compare to males.


This study adds a lot to the body of knowledge on the link between mental health and depression in Covid-19 people who had been quarantined. The first hypothesis was “There would be a strong positive correlation between depression and psychological well-being among people with covid-19 after quarantine” In patients who had been quarantined with Covid-19, depression and psychological well-being were found to have a significant negative correlation. The COVID-19 epidemic has had a detrimental effect on the mental and psychological health of many people. For example, they found that many of the quarantined individuals had some degree of anxiety or depression (as well as socioeconomic status). This could suggest a bad quality of life or an unsatisfactory life24. Most at risk were those who had been isolated. Help is urgently needed for young adults and those who have previously been vulnerable. People aren’t paying much attention to the COVID-19 facts being disseminated. This could be exacerbated by a lack of data from public health professionals25. COVID-19-induced sadness has a significant impact on future professional anxiety, which comes full circle in a complete intercession. People are becoming more and more pessimistic and anxious about their futures, which has a long-term negative effect on the human psyche26.

There is a pressing need for psychological remedies that can identify or treat individuals at various stages of mental discomfort. Even though they have different meanings, isolation and quarantine are two ways of being cut off from loved ones. Depressed people tended to be more isolated than those who were close to their loved ones, with 40% of those polled having depression27. COVID-19 patients under quarantine may benefit from regular communication to keep their spirits up. Quarantined persons with symptoms of depression were more likely to complain of depression than those without symptoms. Telephone and text messaging communication with loved ones and friends helped people cope with their emotions of loneliness28. Many public health measures, such as quarantine, are employed in the fight against the spread of contagious diseases. Quarantine restrictions were frequently associated with negative psychological effects and suffering. People’s perceptions of personal risk may have been heightened as a result of the high prevalence of COVID-19 transmission and the severity and rapidity of its spread28,29.   During COVID-19, physical disturbance is a substantial risk factor for depression. The underlying response of individuals to the epidemic could potentially contribute to sadness and mental health issues. The major driver of the link between self-esteem and psychological well-being is psychological health, not the environment27,29.

Depression has a considerable detrimental impact on psychological wellbeing among Covid-19 persons after quarantine, according to a study. Coronavirus infection in 2019 has caused havoc on the psychological and mental health of sufferers. In order to treat psychosocial issues, there is a lack of information on the topic of Covid 1928,29. Earlier research highlighted the possible harmful impact of COVID-19’s antidepressant effects on the disease itself. Symptoms of depression include a general de-activation of the body and mind, as well as a decrease in an emotional state and pleasure-seeking behavior. As well as that, researchers discovered that anxiety was closely related to feelings of tension and anxiety, both of which have been linked to depression29. This suggests a fear-to-anxiety-to-depression pathway. Self-esteem and psychological wellness were negatively correlated with depression because of its buffering effect, which prevented unpleasant psychological components from being linked30.

We came to the third conclusion that “After quarantine, there would be significant gender variations in depression and psychological well-being between patients with Covid-19”. A new study has found that women in the study had higher mean scores on depression and psychological well-being than men. In contrast to male undergraduates, female undergraduates scored higher on depression and psychological wellness. One of the socioeconomic characteristics most linked to psychological distress in students was the female gender. During the outbreak, this characteristic was associated to feelings of melancholy, anxiety, and stress. No matter how many studies demonstrate men with COVID-19 have a worse prognosis, mounting data suggests the psychological toll on women is harsher27. in this study results shows that women are more depressed and upset than men.  COVID-19 had a considerable effect on the physical and mental well-being of college pupils, despite the small number of students who participated in the study, according to earlier research31.   In the wake of long-term job losses, human healthcare, family services, and financial concerns have all come to the forefront. The heightened impact of quarantine has resulted in a high percentage of distress, melancholy, worry, tension, and even self-reported suicide thoughts32.

People with a history of mental illness are at the highest risk of emotional distress, according to our findings, and should be given priority for psychological evaluation. Lack of income, poor housing, physical exercise and high levels of physical activity, and not remaining with parents were all associated to mental health issues33. Being a woman over the age of 40 and having a chronic or mental illness were among the risk variables linked to hypertension. Being a woman was associated with despair, pressure, and stretching among the Italian masses35. The Chinese population’s high levels of depression, stress, and anxiety were found to be linked to three factors: being a student, having genuine side effects, and believing oneself to be chronically weak34. Detainees’ levels of depression grew by 1.3 units as their isolation time increased. People’s failure to adjust to new environments could be to blame. Depression was 2.5 times as common in female quarantines than in male quarantines 35.


The study on the COVID-19 epidemic found a link between increased stress, anxiety, and depression in those who were isolated for a short period of time. People who have been placed in home confinement as a result of lockdown measures must also focus on their psychological well-being and mental health.


The following authors have made substantial contributions to the manuscript as under:

Conception or Design:  Lariab Khursheed, Sadaf Hafeez Chohan

Acquisition, Analysis or Interpretation of Data: Sadaf Hafeez Chohan, Laraib Khursheed,Amna Alvi

Manuscript Approval & Writing: Sadaf Chohan, Laraib Khursheed and Amna Alvi

All authors acknowledge their accountability for all facets of the research, ensuring that any concerns regarding the accuracy or integrity of the work are duly investigated and resolved.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We’d like to extend our heartfelt gratitude to the individuals and the participants of the study, who helped us with the data collection. In addition, the cooperation of the researchers who granted permission to use their scales is highly appreciated.

INFORMED CONSENT: After obtaining informed consent, the study’s participants, both men and women were drawn from the Covid-19 population.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: This study found no evidence of a conflict of interest.


ETHICS STATEMENTS: Every ethical consideration was taken into account during the investigation. The Riphah International University’s ethical review committee gave the final go-ahead. The goal of the study was clearly articulated by those who participated in the survey. All of their personal information was preserved and their identities were safeguarded.


  1. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2010. World Health Organization; 2010 May 10.
  2. Moghanibashi-Mansourieh A. Assessing the anxiety level of Iranian general population during COVID-19 outbreak. Asian journal of psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;51: pp 102076.
  3. Lui G, Ling L, Lai CK, Tso EY, Fung KS, Chan V, Ho TH, Luk F, Chen Z, Ng JK, Chow KM. Viral dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 across a spectrum of disease severity in COVID-19. Journal of Infection. 2020 Aug 1;81(2): pp 318-356.
  4. Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, Lofy KH, Wiesman J, Bruce H, Spitters C, Ericson K, Wilkerson S, Tural A, Diaz G. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. New England journal of medicine. 2020 Jan 31.
  5. Balaratnasingam S, Janca A. Mass hysteria revisited. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2006 Mar 1;19(2): pp 171-174.
  6. Özdin S, Bayrak Özdin Ş. Levels and predictors of anxiety, depression and health anxiety during COVID-19 pandemic in Turkish society: The importance of gender. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;66(5): pp 504-511.
  7. Kanadiya MK, Sallar AM. Preventive behaviors, beliefs, and anxieties in relation to the swine flu outbreak among college students aged 18–24 years. Journal of Public Health. 2011 Apr;19(2): pp 139-145.
  8. Rubin CB. Long term recovery from disasters–The neglected component of emergency management. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. 2009 Jul 6;6(1).
  9. Bakker A, Wagner D. Pandemic: lessons for today and tomorrow?. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 2020 May;104(1): pp 1-4.
  10. Pappas S. How will people react to the new financial crisis. American Psychological Association. 2020 Apr 6.
  11. Coibion O, Gorodnichenko Y, Weber M. The cost of the covid-19 crisis: Lockdowns, macroeconomic expectations, and consumer spending. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2020 May 11.
  12. Yetgin D, Benligiray S. The effect of economic anxiety and occupational burnout levels of tour guides on their occupational commitment. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. 2019 Apr 3;24(4): pp 333-347.
  13. Shah AS, Wood R, Gribben C, Caldwell D, Bishop J, Weir A, Kennedy S, Reid M, Smith-Palmer A, Goldberg D, McMenamin J. Risk of hospital admission with coronavirus disease 2019 in healthcare workers and their households: nationwide linkage cohort study. bmj. 2020 Oct 28: pp 371.
  14. Goyal K, Chauhan P, Chhikara K, Gupta P, Singh MP. Fear of COVID 2019: First suicidal case in India.
  15. Mahmud MS, Talukder MU, Rahman SM. Does ‘Fear of COVID-19’trigger future career anxiety? An empirical investigation considering depression from COVID-19 as a mediator. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;67(1): pp 35-45.
  16. Choi J. Taylor, S. The psychology of pandemics: Preparing for the next global outbreak of infectious disease. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Asian Communication Research. 2020 Sep;17(2): pp 98-103.
  17. Jun J, Tucker S, Melnyk BM. Clinician mental health and well-being during global healthcare crises: Evidence learned from prior epidemics for COVID-19 pandemic.
  18. Rauwerda NL, Tovote KA, Peeters AC, Sanderman R, Emmelkamp PM, Schroevers MJ, Fleer J. WHO‐5 and BDI‐II are acceptable screening instruments for depression in people with diabetes. Diabetic medicine. 2018 Dec;35(12): pp 1678-1685.
  19. Groarke JM, Berry E, Graham-Wisener L, McKenna-Plumley PE, McGlinchey E, Armour C. Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study. PloS one. 2020 Sep 24;15(9): pp e0239698.
  20. Gassman-Pines A, Ananat EO, Fitz-Henley J. COVID-19 and parent-child psychological well-being. Pediatrics. 2020 Oct 1;146(4).
  21. Ustun G. Determining depression and related factors in a society affected by COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;67(1): pp 54-63.
  22. Coker AO, Coker OO, Sanni D. Psychometric properties of the 21-item depression anxiety stress scale (DASS-21). African Research Review. 2018 Jul 16;12(2): pp 135-142.
  23. Ryff CD, Keyes CL. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1995 Oct;69(4): pp 719.
  24. Sharma K, Saji J, Kumar R, Raju A. Psychological and anxiety/depression level assessment among quarantine people during Covid19 outbreak. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2020 May 15;10(3): pp 198-201.
  25. Lee SA, Jobe MC, Mathis AA. Mental health characteristics associated with dysfunctional coronavirus anxiety. Psychological Medicine. 2021 Jun;51(8): pp 1403-1404.
  26. Mahmud R, Ramamohanarao K, Buyya R. Application management in fog computing environments: A taxonomy, review and future directions. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). 2020 Jul 22;53(4): pp 1-43.
  27. Jassim AH, Inman DM, Mitchell CH. Crosstalk between dysfunctional mitochondria and inflammation in glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2021 Jul 21; 12: pp 699623.
  28. Samrah SM, Al-Mistarehi AH, Ibnian AM, Raffee LA, Momany SM, Al-Ali M, Hayajneh WA, Yusef DH, Awad SM, Khassawneh BY. COVID-19 outbreak in Jordan: Epidemiological features, clinical characteristics, and laboratory findings. Annals of medicine and surgery. 2020 Sep 1;57: pp 103-108.
  29. Hawryluck L, Gold WL, Robinson S, Pogorski S, Galea S, Styra R. SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerging infectious diseases. 2004 Jul;10(7): pp 1206.
  30. Rossi R, Socci V, Talevi D, Mensi S, Niolu C, Pacitti F, Di Marco A, Rossi A, Siracusano A, Di Lorenzo G. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2020: pp 790.
  31. Alkhamees AA, Alrashed SA, Alzunaydi AA, Almohimeed AS, Aljohani MS. The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the general population of Saudi Arabia. Comprehensive psychiatry. 2020 Oct 1; 102: pp 152192.
  32. Rahman MJ, Wahab MA, Nahiduzzaman M, Haque AB, Cohen P. Hilsa fishery management in Bangladesh. InIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 414(1): pp 012018.
  33. Wathelet M, Duhem S, Vaiva G, Baubet T, Habran E, Veerapa E, Debien C, Molenda S, Horn M, Grandgenèvre P, Notredame CE. Factors associated with mental health disorders among university students in France confined during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA network open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10): pp e2025591- e2025591.
  34. Lopes AR, Nihei OK. Depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in Brazilian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Predictors and association with life satisfaction, psychological well-being and coping strategies. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10): pp e0258493.
  35. Hagezom HM, Gebrehiwet AB, Goytom MH, Alemseged EA. Prevalence of depression and associated factors among quarantined individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tigrai treatment and quarantine centers, Tigrai, Ethiopia, 2020: A Cross-Sectional Study. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2021 Jun 4; 14: pp 2113-2119.


The Ziauddin University is on the list of I4OA, I4OC, and JISC.

This is an open- access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).