Zubia Saleem[i], Bushra Ejaz[ii], Farzana Ashfaq[iii]

DOI: 10.36283/pjr.zu.12.1/009


Background and Aim: In today sports such as volleyball and basketball, Vertical Jump is considered as important component that enhance the performance of athlete. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of muscle energy technique on vertical jump performance in volleyball and basketball players.

Methodology: This Randomized Clinical Trial was conducted at Islamic International University Islamabad. Twenty-nine athletes of age 18 – 35 playing basketball and volley as part time/domestic level were included. Post isometric relaxation technique was applied on group A (n=15) and static stretching was applied on group B (n=14). Surface electromyography activity of quadriceps and abdominal muscle was recorded, Stable time, airtime and vertical jump height were measured using two-axis force platform and vertical jump height was measured by motion sensor. Measurements were taken at baseline and immediately after applying interventions to both groups. Data entry and analysis were done by using software SPSS version 22.

Results:   Of the 29 athletes, 15 were in the group A and 14 were in the group B. Immediate assessment of vertical jump height was not significantly improved by post-isometric relaxation relative to static stretching (p=0.594). Muscle recruitment, ground reaction and vertical jump height improved apparently after post isometric relaxation but not significantly.

Conclusion: It appears that post isometric relaxation and static stretching of quadriceps shows no significant difference in vertical jump height.


In this contemporary era, it is important to perform meticulously for an athlete to score the most points for the team. Many sports, such as volleyball and basketball, require persistent leaping ability1. Vertical jump is also considered lower extremity plyometric exercise to increase athlete’s performance and prevention of injury in athletes2. .Before beginning any activity, athletes are recommended to warm up because preliminary warming muscles actively is thought to mitigate the risk of injury and improve outcomes3. Static stretching is used widely in the field during warm-up and training practices, because it is thought to be beneficial in the game by increasing the joint range of motion4,5. However, some researchers have concluded that there may be negative effects on the overall performance after application of static stretching that include reduction of overall power, speed and inducing a short-term strength in the muscles especially in high performance athletes6,8. Muscle energy technique is now used as manual technique to increase Range of Motion (ROM) and reduction of pain. It is a form of soft tissue treatment in which subject actively and precisely contracts muscles against the counterforce applied by the therapist, it increases the extensibility of muscle and joint motion9,10.

Study conducted by Jonathan et al to determine the effects different duration of stretching on contractile properties of lower extremity muscles and concluded that moderate duration of static stretching play significant role in enhancing vertical jump performance11. There is also evidence by the study that acute effect of static stretching cause reduction in torque and myotendinous junction may prevent from injury prevention12. A study done by Hough et al compared the effects of dynamic stretching and static stretching on vertical jump performance on 11 healthy men who participated in competitive sports. This study concluded that, relative to dynamic stretching, vertical jump efficiency was significantly reduced after static stretching (4.19 ± 4.47%) and vertical jump performance after dynamic stretching was significantly improved.13. High intensity-load also prolonged the duration of post-activation potentiation and increased vertical jump is also concluded by the evidence that muscle energy technique is considered very effective in increasing range of motion, reduction of pain and enhancing flexibility of muscle.15-17. Young et al explored the effects of SS, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and maximal voluntary contraction on explosive force production and jumping performance and concluded that significant decrement in the jump performance after SS as compared to other stretching techniques3.

The aim of the study was to determine the immediate effects of post-isometric relaxation (PIR) compared to static stretching (SS) on vertical jump height and EMG activity of quadriceps and abdominals after stretching as both structure involved during vertical jump. The impact of PIR and SS on ground reaction forces during vertical jumping was also assessed. It was believed that the vertical jump height would increase immediately after applying PIR compared to the SS.


Study Design

A randomized controlled trial was performed among athletes in the Islamic International University Islamabad, for a period of One Year following approval by the Ethics Committee (RIPHAH/RCRS/Letter-0062). Athletes 18–35 years of age who played basketball and volleyball on a part-time or domestic basis were recruited in the study. Every athlete signed a written consent form before participating in the study. Athletes with a history of lower extremity strain/sprain in the last 6 months, neuro-musculoskeletal and cardiovascular pathology were excluded from the study. Thirty athletes were selected in the study that fulfills the inclusion criteria and 1 drop out during the study. Sample was selected by non-probability convenience sampling.

Data Collection Tools

Athletes performed squat vertical jump on Two-axis force platform PS-2142 by PASCO. It allows measurement of vertical, horizontal and parallel forces applied directly on the platform. In normal circumstances, Forceplates have capacity to bear 4400N in normal direction and 1100N force when lie parallel to the surface. The size of forceplate was 35cm x 35cm in horizontal and vertical plane and total mass of forceplate was 6.4 kg3. Forceplates were settled on the smooth and hard surface and connected with the computer via software of Pasco. Motion sensor (PS-2103) also attached on the forceplates that measure the position of feet and measure speed when jump or land on the forceplates. Surface electromyography (MP-36 BIOPAC) was used to check electrical activity of quadriceps and abdominal muscles. The device connected by electrode. Input and output devices and transducers. The tool is FDA approved and have high validity and reliability18. Two electrodes were mounted on quadriceps muscles with the distance of 4cm between them and 2 electrodes placed on the abdominal muscle with the same distance.


Those athletes meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to group A (Muscle energy Technique) and group B (Static Stretching). Fifteen athletes who were included in the group A, each athlete was guided to avoid jerky movements and inhale during contraction phase and exhale during relaxation phase. The athlete assumed prone position. A physiotherapist performed post-isometric relaxation technique on the quadriceps muscles. First an end range of quadriceps muscles was assessed, and the athlete was requested to place 20% of their maximum voluntary contraction while the physiotherapist resisted this movement for 6-10 seconds. This process was repeated 4 times for each new range immediately without any rest interval. Post-reading assessment taken immediately after the intervention in lower extremities. Fourteen athletes were included in the group B. Static stretching was applied on athletes in prone position and Physiotherapist stands on the side of the tables and stretch applied for 30 seconds of duration. It included 3 stretches of 30 seconds duration with 20 seconds rest intervals between each stretch. Post-reading assessments were taken immediately after the interventions. 

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered and analyzed through SPSS version 22. Test of normality applied to check distribution of data. Demographics of the result presented in Mean and Standard Deviation. Pre and post-assessment analysis was done by Paired Sample T Test and group comparison was done by Independent Sample T test.

Ethical Concerns

The study will be started after taking approval from Research Ethical Committee and making sure that there is no ethical issue involved in this study. A written consent form will be given to the participants of each group and confidentiality will be highly maintained.


The demographics of the study shows that mean age and standard deviation of both groups was 20.87±1.13 and 20.78±1.80 respectively. The body mass index (BMI) of athletes was 21.41±1.90 and 22.83±3.06 in group A and group B respectively. The demographics of the subjects are shown in table 1.

Electrical activity of Quadriceps and Abdominal muscles was assessed through Electromyography and Airtime, Stability and vertical jump height were assessed through forceplates.  The electrical activity of Quadriceps during jumping at baseline was 0.424±0.110 and 0.495±0.204 in group A and B respectively which show no statistically significant difference in both intervention (P value=0.24). The electrical activity of abdominal muscles recorded by the electromyography shows baseline mean±SD is 0.42±0.11 and 0.49±0.20 in group A and group B respectively. Post-intervention assessment by electromyography shows mean±SD in group A and B was 0.07±0.10 and 0.05±0.06 during jumping phase that shows no significant difference in both intervention (value=0.51).

The airtime was recorded by the forceplates when athlete remains in the air and their feet’s contact back to the forceplates after vertical jump. The airtime of subjects after application of intervention was 2.14±0.51 and 2.39±0.47 in group A and group B respectively that shows no significant difference in both intervention (p value=0.182). The mean±SD of vertical jump height in group A and group B was 0.30±0.15 and 0.32±0.12 respectively. There is no statistically significant difference between the intervention (P value= 0.59). Paired sample-test was used to measure pre-intervention and post-intervention assessment of Group A and Group B. The vertical jump height mean±SD of group A was 0.29±0.11 at baseline and 0.30± 0.14 immediately after the application of intervention and there is no statistically significance (P value=0.909). Cohen’s D shows mild effect size (Cohen’s D=0.258).  The vertical jump height mean±SD of group B was 0.32± 0.140at baseline and 0.32± 0.12 immediately after the application of intervention and there is no statistically significance (P value=0.88)


From the origin of sports, coaches with their team members focus on the athlete’s performance and prevent them from injury. Vertical jump that includes eccentric muscle activity of quadriceps used in almost all sports with major or minor role and vertical jump is one of the important components in athlete’s performance. The purpose of this study was to determine, immediate effects of the Post Isometric Relaxation (PIR) as compared to the Static Stretch on vertical jump height. Electrical activity of quadriceps and abdominal muscles were measured during the jumping phase of vertical jump. Forceplates were used to assess the stability time of subjects when their feet’s contact the forceplates, airtime and jumping height. The baseline mean±SD of vertical jump height in group A was 0.298±0.119. Post-isometric relaxation technique was given to the subjects with 20% activation of their muscles and hold of 10 seconds with 4 repetitions. The post-intervention assessment of group A shows mean±SD was 0.300± 0.147 with P value= 0.909 which shows that there is no significant effect of muscle energy technique but there is mild effect size of muscle energy technique apparently Cohen’s D= 0.258. Lauren Noto Bell et al conducted a study in 2019 on competitive swimmers to determine the effect of post-isometric relaxation technique on ankle range of motion and concluded that range of motion of bilateral ankle joint increase but there is no immediate improvement in the performance of swimmers.19. The agility is considered as reaction time to the assigned task and vertical jump also required less reaction time to act on the given task.  T Buress et all conducted a study on forty healthy active males to determine the effect of contract relax agonist contract stretch which resembles with the post-isometric relaxation technique, the study also concluded that intervention increase 237% hamstring flexibility immediately after the application of intervention but there is no significant effect on agility and speed20. A recent study conducted in 2020 to compare active isolated stretch with post-isometric relaxation in enhancing flexibility of hamstring muscles in young adults and concluded that there is no significant difference of both interventions21.The baseline mean±SD of vertical jump height in group B was 0.328± 0.140. Static stretch of quadriceps was applied for the duration of 30 seconds with 20 seconds of rest interval and 2 repetitions of stretch were applied.  The post-intervention assessment of group B shows mean±SD was 0.324± 0.126 with P value= 0.880 which shows that there is no significant effect of static stretching. A study conducted by Lucas P et al in 2018 to compare different types of stretches on sprint and vertical jump performance that concluded that passive or static stretch shows negative effect on vertical jump performance22. A pilot study conducted by Agnieszka et al in 2020 to see the influence of static stretch on vertical jump parameters of volley ball players and concluded that static stretching have negative effect on performance parameters immediately after application of static stretching23,24. A critical and systematic review was done in 2020 to see acute effect of warm up, exercise and recovery strategies on performance of soccer players that also concluded that accuracy of kicking, velocity of ball improved by using dynamic stretching as warm-ups but static stretching reduce performance parameters in soccer players25.


It is concluded by the current study that muscle energy technique and stretching shows no significant difference on vertical jump whereas it seems that muscle recruitment, ground reaction forces were improved by post isometric relaxation in comparison to static stretching. Further study should be done by adding follow-up after 24 hours and large sample size.


  1. Watkins CM, Barillas SR, Wong MA, Archer DC, Dobbs IJ, Lockie RG, Coburn JW, Tran TT, Brown LE. Determination of vertical jump as a measure of neuromuscular readiness and fatigue. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2017 Dec 1;31(12):3305-10.
  2. Dello Iacono A, Martone D, Milic M, Padulo J. Vertical-vs. horizontal-oriented drop jump training: chronic effects on explosive performances of elite handball players. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2017 Apr 1;31(4):921-31.
  3. Young W, Elliott S. Acute effects of static stretching, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching, and maximum voluntary contractions on explosive force production and jumping performance. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72(3):273-9.
  4. Piper S, Shearer HM, Côté P, Wong JJ, Yu H, Varatharajan S, Southerst D, Randhawa KA, Sutton DA, Stupar M, Nordin MC. The effectiveness of soft-tissue therapy for the management of musculoskeletal disorders and injuries of the upper and lower extremities: A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Manual therapy. 2016 Feb 1;21:18-34.
  5. Medeiros DM, Cini A, Sbruzzi G, Lima CS. Influence of static stretching on hamstring flexibility in healthy young adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy theory and practice. 2016 Aug 17;32(6):438-45.
  6. Behm DG, Blazevich AJ, Kay AD, McHugh M. Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review. Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism. 2016;41(1):1-1.
  7. Opplert J, Babault N. Acute effects of dynamic stretching on muscle flexibility and performance: an analysis of the current literature. Sports Medicine. 2018 Feb;48(2):299-325.
  8. Chaabene H, Behm DG, Negra Y, Granacher U. Acute effects of static stretching on muscle strength and power: An attempt to clarify previous caveats. Frontiers in physiology. 2019 Nov 29;10:1468.
  9. Thomas E, Cavallaro AR, Mani D, Bianco A, Palma A. The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review. Chiropractic & manual therapies. 2019;27(1):1-18.
  10. Chaitow L. Integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique (INIT) and myofascial pain. Muscle Energy Techniques: with access to www chaitowmuscleenergytechniques com. 2013:303.
  11. Reid JC, Greene R, Young JD, Hodgson DD, Blazevich AJ, Behm DG. The effects of different durations of static stretching within a comprehensive warm-up on voluntary and evoked contractile properties. European journal of applied physiology. 2018 Jul;118(7):1427-45.
  12. Riccetti M, Opplert J, Durigan JL, Cometti C, Babault N. Acute static stretching results in muscle-specific alterations amongst the hamstring muscles. Sports. 2020 Sep;8(9):119.
  13. Hough PA, Ross EZ, Howatson G. Effects of dynamic and static stretching on vertical jump performance and electromyographic activity. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(2):507-12.
  14. Lowery RP, Duncan NM, Loenneke JP, Sikorski EM, Naimo MA, Brown LE, et al. The effects of potentiating stimuli intensity under varying rest periods on vertical jump performance and power. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(12):3320-5.
  15. Ballantyne F, Fryer G, McLaughlin P. The effect of muscle energy technique on hamstring extensibility: The mechanism of altered flexibility. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2003;6:59-63.
  16. Kumar P, Moitra M. Efficacy of muscle energy technique and pnf stretching compared to conventional physiotherapy in program of hamstring flexibility in chronic nonspecific low back pain. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther Int J. 2015 Jul;9(3):103.
  17. Kage V, Bootwala F, Kudchadkar G. Effect of bowen technique versus muscle energy technique on asymptomatic subjects with hamstring tightness: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2017;6(4):102-8.
  18. MP ACQUISITION UNITS 2020 [updated Updated: 9.10.2020. Available from:
  19. Noto-Bell L, Vogel BN, Senn DE. effects of post–isometric relaxation on ankle plantarflexion and timed flutter kick in pediatric competitive swimmers. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2019;119(9):569-77.
  20. Burgess T, Vadachalam T, Buchholtz K, Jelsma J. The effect of the contract-relax-agonist-contract (CRAC) stretch of hamstrings on range of motion, sprint and agility performance in moderately active males: A randomised control trial. South African Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019;31(1):1-5.
  21. Naweed J, Razzaq M, Sheraz S, Anwar N, Sadiq N, Naweed S. Comparison of active isolated stretch and post isometric relaxation for improving hamstring flexibility in young healthy adults. PAFMJ. 2020;70(3):770-75.
  22. Oliveira LP, Vieira LH, Aquino R, Manechini JP, Santiago PR, Puggina EF. Acute effects of active, ballistic, passive, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on sprint and vertical jump performance in trained young soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2018;32(8):2199-208.
  23. Ćwirlej-Sozańska AB, Wójcik O, Wójcik J, Mól M, Kolasa T. The influence of static stretching of specific lower limb muscle groups on the jump height parameter of volleyball players aged 16-17: a pilot study. Advances in Rehabilitation. 2021;35(1):32-8.
  24. Azizi M, Shadmehr A, Malmir K, Ghotbi N, Pour ZK. The pilot study of the immediate effect of muscle energy technique on flexibility and stiffness in healthy young females. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2018;12(3):195-200.
  25. Vieira LHP, Santinelli FB, Carling, Kellis E, Santiago PR, Barbieri FA. Acute effects of warm-up, exercise and recovery-related strategies on assessments of soccer kicking performance: a critical and systematic review. Sports Medicine. 2020:1-4.


The Ziauddin University is on the list of I4OA ( & I4OC (
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
Conflict of Interest: The author (s) have no conflict.

[i] Occupational Therapist, Sindh Institute Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation, Karachi (0000-0002-4057-1268)

[ii] Occupational Therapist, Sindh Institute Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation, Karachi (0000-0001-6161-3079)

[iii] Senior Lecturer, Sindh Institute Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation, Karachi (0000-0003-1735-5337)